Foundation

GTC Research for Teachers (RfT) Review of Websites

GTC required a review of websites, portals or electronic resources that offer access to research on teaching and learning, designed primarily for a teacher audience (examples include the Teacher Training Resource Bank, the Research Informed Practice Site, the Evidence in Education Portal, Practical Research for Education), to inform the way in which Research for Teachers can continue to differentiate itself and add value. This report sets out the results of the review.

TDA Masters in Teaching and Learning (MTL) Programme Reports

The TDA developed a programme for a  Masters in Teaching and Learning (MTL) to meet the then government’s stated ambitions in the Children’s Plan (2007) and Being the best for our children (2008) to raise teaching to a masters level profession. The starting point for this paper is the MTL requirement (set out in the policy documents) for work based professional learning to be supported by school based coaching. The Masters' programme was piloted in specific regions of England for one year before being abandoned by the new Coalition Government in 2011.

Nevertheless, the examination of the underpinning evidence set out in this report is of more enduring relevance to teacher initial and continuing professional learning.

 

The report Professional Learning and the Role of the Coach in the new Masters in Teaching and Learning Masters in Teaching and Learning (LTL); Technical Report  and a Summary of the full report are both downloadable from here

 

TDA Postgraduate Professional Development (PPD) Reports - Year 3

It is clear that the partnership models and operations have developed over the three years of the project. In particular, schools have become more knowledgeable consumers of professional development. Partnerships also tend to be more equal and schools are making a more substantial contribution (for example in the design of new modules in response to a specified need) than appeared to be the case at the start of the project. HEIs appear to have developed processes and systems which enable them to be more responsive in terms of both content and delivery.

There were indications from three providers that they were positively encouraging schools to develop their contribution as an equal partner, rather than a purchaser of what the provider had to offer. On this evidence, there may be more scope for providers to review the actions they take to help schools build their muscles to define their own CPD needs and exploit the partnership for solutions and specialist resources.

TDA Postgraduate Professional Development (PPD) Reports - Year 2

In 1998 the Teaching and Development Agency for Schools (TDA) led the Award-bearing In-Service Education and Training (INSET) scheme for the (then) Department for Education and Skills (DfES). A joint review by TDA and the DfES published in 2003 highlighted areas for development, including:

  • improving the responsiveness of courses to local needs;
  • increasing the accessibility and flexibility of courses; and
  • increasing participation amongst teachers and monitoring the impact of courses.

 

In response to these recommendations, and building on the strengths of the existing award-bearing INSET scheme, the TDA developed a new programme of award bearing postgraduate courses known as the Postgraduate Professional Development (PPD) programme. The TDA PPD programme provides funding to support teachers’ learning and development at postgraduate level (M level). Allocations of the first round of funding for PPD courses were made in February 2005, for the academic year 2005/06.

TDA Postgraduate Professional Development (PPD) Reports - Year 1

CUREE was commissioned by TDA to undertake a short scoping study on patterns of participation of black and minority ethnic (BME) teachers and teachers with disabilities in Post-graduate Professional Development (PPD) programmes. These reports are the result of the first year of this project.

CUREE Newsletter March 2012

Philippa’s Blog

Here we are looking forwards to the glories of an English spring and an Easter break. It’s good to have a rhythm to steady us  in the turmoil of so much headline change in the education system. I was reflecting on the scale of the changes at a conference at the weekend as we analysed challenges facing the system and the areas of policy that might be holding us all back. Mathew Taylor from RSA properly (and entertainingly) pointed us towards the challenges of productivity – of meeting more and more needs with ever fewer resources. Where, he asked, are the engines for innovation that will help us straddle these competing demands? Which policies, I asked myself, get in the way of this? Here is a possibly controversial one.